In the USA Surgeons: 4 Things to Decrease Game 2 Between the Thunder and Pacers

While some will say that a meeting between Indiana Facebook and Oklahoma City is not attractive enough, game number 1 in the NBA final provided a great action and a victory basket that could enter history, so that all basketball enthusiasts are eagerly expecting Game 2. What happened in the first game. The Tander’s balance sheet opened: 12:57. But they are now lagging 1: 0 in the final series after coach MarkDinelett has chosen to play with a lower vehicle when he put the Gardon Cyison Wallas into the quintet in his place, and thus disassembled the high duo Hartnstein and Chat Hallmigran. Objective: Tackle better with Indiana’s fast pace and adjust the composition to that of the opponent. How did it work? Okay, if the 20 Indiana ball losses focus on the first half – at the end, Oklahoma City led 45:57. But less good when it comes to the rebound, where the Pacers have clearly controlled – 39: 56. Hacharmagen, who is considered part of OKC’s “Great Tree”, recorded averaging 16.4 points and 8.6 rebounds in the first three playoffs. In the first game in the final he finished with only 6 and 6 in less than 24 minutesplay. Hartnstein played only 17 minutes and recorded 9 points and 7 rebounds-data that were reasonable in relation to his minutes, but not satisfying. Simple surgery: The Hatander was in the balance of 3:37 in the regular season when they were in equality or won the rebound, and 1: 8 in the playoffs. When they do not control the boards – they are a 50%group. It is worth remembering that New York also had especially effective minutes against Indiana when Miyri Robinson and Carl -Anthony Towns played together. The Pacers “Choose” to open the 2025 final series. This adapted to OKC’s defensive pressure style, butVery unusual from Indiana’s side, which is usually more accurate despite its fast style. “We like a controlled chaos, but it was just an ugly chaos,” Tyrais Halibaron said. Indiana changed access after half: slowing down the pace-from 54 poses in the first half to 47 per second. The dedication became more accurate, and players stayed in their seller – Topin Object lost three times in the first 5 minutes, but kept the ball in the subsequent 20 minutes. They came to 110 points – thanks to the Halibloon victory basket – and kept it on the success indexTheir main: Indiana in 23:45 in the regular season and 0: 13 in the playoffs when she is at least 110 points. When she is less swallowed – her balance sheet is 14: 5. The same principle is also valid for precision and scoring percentage: The Pacers are scoring 49.6% of the field, including 40.5% across the bow, with a True Shooting) of 61.2% – data that will place them first in the playoffs in all three categories. The returning sessions in front of rivalry to reveal weaknesses in defenses and perform good injection elections. As with the total points – here too: Indiana in the 0:13 balance sheet when it is at least 45% of the field or more than 33% of the three. OKC will doWisdom if you focus less on inducing Indiana to lose balls, and more difficult for injections and push its scenes from the comfortable positions. In the second half of Game 1: Indiana scored 51.1%, scored 10 out of 20 threes, winning the half 53:66. But in 39 minutes, only 3 assists – less than half of his seasonal average. OKC as a team recorded only 13 assists on 39 field baskets – very far from its seasonal average, 26.9 assists per game. In fact, OKC gave only 208 dedication throughout the game. It’s one way to avoid losses (they only had 7), but it went too far. According to ESPN, this is a numberThe lowest dedication of a team throughout the season (!) – And the second most low playoff game since they began to follow the 2013/14 season. Jaylan Williams led OKC with 6 assists – his average – but he may have to initiate more to diversify. The OKC bench, combined with 71 minutes of play – provided only two assists. As far as the West champion is concerned, these things should change.